<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Mirroring Discussion Topic	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://loveorlearn.com/mirroring/mirroring-discussion-topic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://loveorlearn.com/mirroring/mirroring-discussion-topic/</link>
	<description>We Live in peace and joy by Loving or Learning from everything in Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:55:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: yucel		</title>
		<link>https://loveorlearn.com/mirroring/mirroring-discussion-topic/#comment-18</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yucel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://choose.ws/?p=65#comment-18</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello Nancy,  Thank you for sharing your observation.  It gets to the heart of mirroring.

While they mirror us, we mirror them.  And, assuming mirroring is the truth, then even if &quot;we don’t grant permission, are not available or do not allow their anger/frustration to manifest itself &quot; this I believe would mean we are in fact still a mirror but a distant one.   Kind of like the mirror in the other room, or maybe more accurately, a mirror which is on a car going away from the person.   But still a mirror none the less.  And, what if they get in a faster car and track us down?  Have we by being caught given them permission?  Or did we run just for them to give chase.   

Recall too, if we are still taking as a given that the law of attraction is working 100% of the time.  Then they being in our life is a kind of permission to co-mirror, since we created them, and they created us.

It is an excellent discussion thread.
Y]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Nancy,  Thank you for sharing your observation.  It gets to the heart of mirroring.</p>
<p>While they mirror us, we mirror them.  And, assuming mirroring is the truth, then even if &#8220;we don’t grant permission, are not available or do not allow their anger/frustration to manifest itself &#8221; this I believe would mean we are in fact still a mirror but a distant one.   Kind of like the mirror in the other room, or maybe more accurately, a mirror which is on a car going away from the person.   But still a mirror none the less.  And, what if they get in a faster car and track us down?  Have we by being caught given them permission?  Or did we run just for them to give chase.   </p>
<p>Recall too, if we are still taking as a given that the law of attraction is working 100% of the time.  Then they being in our life is a kind of permission to co-mirror, since we created them, and they created us.</p>
<p>It is an excellent discussion thread.<br />
Y</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nancy		</title>
		<link>https://loveorlearn.com/mirroring/mirroring-discussion-topic/#comment-17</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nancy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://choose.ws/?p=65#comment-17</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yucel, I know you and I talked about this earlier; after re-reading today&#039;s excellent and thought-provoking post (in particular the final paragraph dealing with the concept of mirroring in the most basic form: your example of another using us as a mirror to display their anger or frustration) I started to think about PERMISSION. The idea of permission came to mind; availability, allowing. Do we inherently grant permission for another person to use us as a mirror simply by being there? By being present for them? And, do we necessarily need permission to mirror from the other person? What if we don&#039;t grant permission, are not available or do not allow their anger/frustration to manifest itself this way? Thoughts? Do we need permission? I think, in a true, pure friendship, this permission is a given. Never asked for, always granted inherently.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yucel, I know you and I talked about this earlier; after re-reading today&#8217;s excellent and thought-provoking post (in particular the final paragraph dealing with the concept of mirroring in the most basic form: your example of another using us as a mirror to display their anger or frustration) I started to think about PERMISSION. The idea of permission came to mind; availability, allowing. Do we inherently grant permission for another person to use us as a mirror simply by being there? By being present for them? And, do we necessarily need permission to mirror from the other person? What if we don&#8217;t grant permission, are not available or do not allow their anger/frustration to manifest itself this way? Thoughts? Do we need permission? I think, in a true, pure friendship, this permission is a given. Never asked for, always granted inherently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
